Re: Logical Replication of sequences
| От | Michael Paquier | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Logical Replication of sequences | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | aOHWusf1WkHapo-C@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | Re: Logical Replication of sequences (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) | 
| Ответы | 
                	
            		Re: Logical Replication of sequences
            		
            		 Re: Logical Replication of sequences  | 
		
| Список | pgsql-hackers | 
On Sat, Oct 04, 2025 at 09:24:32PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > In the 0001 patch, pg_get_sequence_data() exposes two new fields > log_cnt and page_lsn. I see that the later subscriber-side patch uses > both, the first one in SetSequence(). It is not clear from the > comments or the commit message of 0001 why it is necessary to use > log_cnt when setting the sequence. Can you explain what the problem > will be if we don't use log_cnt during sequence sync? FWIW, I have argued two times at least that it should never be necessary to expose log_cnt in the sequence meta-data: this is just a counter to decide when a WAL record of a sequence should be generated. If you are copying some sequence data over the wire on a new node in a logical shape where WAL is independent, this counter is irrelevant: you can just reset it. Please see also a83a944e9fdd. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: