Re: Logical Replication of sequences
| От | Amit Kapila |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAA4eK1J-zuuiLHiOzWaSBFSn7BZctbUYX6Kw+FCbV71FUwUgrA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Logical Replication of sequences (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Re: Logical Replication of sequences |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 9:55 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > In the 0001 patch, pg_get_sequence_data() exposes two new fields log_cnt and page_lsn. I see that the later subscriber-side patch uses both, the first one in SetSequence(). It is not clear from the comments or the commit message of 0001 why it is necessary to use log_cnt when setting the sequence. Can you explain what the problem will be if we don't use log_cnt during sequence sync? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: