Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a86b7fa3-6764-9b06-076c-01fd7d9e99e9@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/14/18 03:28, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> I wonder how others feel about this, but the spelling of >>> enable_partition_wise_join feels funny to me every time I look at it. I >>> would write it enable_partitionwise_join. >> >> +1 >> >> See also: https://postgr.es/m/20171005134847.shzldz2ublrb3ny2@alvherre.pgsql > > To that I replied with > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjFpRcsZnxCen88a-16R5EYqPCwFYnFThM%2Bmjagu%3DB1QvxPVA%40mail.gmail.com. > I didn't get any further response, so nothing was changed that time. > Alvaro, Peter, Gavin have voted for partitionwise in this thread and > Robert had similar objections earlier. Looks like we should change it. done -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: