Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFjFpRee0vF9mgiXGnO33zbZVgc5N67J0nY39zR0FWxfunVTvg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: spelling of enable_partition_wise_join
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> I wonder how others feel about this, but the spelling of >> enable_partition_wise_join feels funny to me every time I look at it. I >> would write it enable_partitionwise_join. > > +1 > > See also: https://postgr.es/m/20171005134847.shzldz2ublrb3ny2@alvherre.pgsql To that I replied with https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFjFpRcsZnxCen88a-16R5EYqPCwFYnFThM%2Bmjagu%3DB1QvxPVA%40mail.gmail.com. I didn't get any further response, so nothing was changed that time. Alvaro, Peter, Gavin have voted for partitionwise in this thread and Robert had similar objections earlier. Looks like we should change it. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat EnterpriseDB Corporation The Postgres Database Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: