Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes

>     Does the attached fix look correct?  Haven't checked the fix with ATTACH
>     PARTITION though.
> 
> 
> Attached patch seems to fix the problem.  However, I would rather get
> rid of modifying stmt->indexParams.  That seems to be more logical
> for me.  Also, it would be good to check some covering indexes on
> partitioned tables.  See the attached patch.
Seems right way, do not modify incoming object and do not copy rather large and 
deep nested structure as suggested by Amit.

But it will  be better to have a ATTACH PARTITION test too.

-- 
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
                                                    WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/