Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJGNTeM=XO2eve+YFdwS5ag+zQi6mHa5d-iKNLtNVZcMwvThcQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10 April 2018 at 10:36, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> wrote: >> Does the attached fix look correct? Haven't checked the fix with >> ATTACH >> PARTITION though. >> >> >> Attached patch seems to fix the problem. However, I would rather get >> rid of modifying stmt->indexParams. That seems to be more logical >> for me. Also, it would be good to check some covering indexes on >> partitioned tables. See the attached patch. > > Seems right way, do not modify incoming object and do not copy rather large > and deep nested structure as suggested by Amit. > > But it will be better to have a ATTACH PARTITION test too. > the patch worked for me, i also tried some combinations using ATTACH PARTITION and found no problems -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: