Re: Better help output for pgbench -I init_steps
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Better help output for pgbench -I init_steps |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a37abd83-001b-4324-d5bd-7ff0d037ef64@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Better help output for pgbench -I init_steps (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Better help output for pgbench -I init_steps
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12.07.23 15:41, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2023-Jul-12, Gurjeet Singh wrote: > >> The init-steps are severely under-documented in pgbench --help output. >> I think at least a pointer to the the pgbench docs should be mentioned >> in the pgbench --help output; an average user may not rush to read the >> code to find the explanation, but a hint to where to find more details >> about what the letters in --init-steps mean, would save them a lot of >> time. > > Agreed. > > I would do it the way `pg_waldump --rmgr=list` or `psql > --help=variables` are handled: they give you a list of what is > supported. You don't have to put the list in the main --help output. I think I prefer variant 2. Currently we only have 8 steps, so it might be overkill to separate them out into a different option.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: