Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a32731aff83e4c4e0800a00d9692b719@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft (Alex Turner <armtuk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Oracle is not that expensive - standard one can be got for $149/user > or $5k/CPU, and for most applications, the features in standard one > are fine. Don't forget your support contract cost, as well as licenses for each of your servers: development, testing, QA, etc. Is it really as "cheap" as 5K? I've heard that for any fairly modern system, it's much more, but that may be wrong. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200501122029 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFB5c8gvJuQZxSWSsgRAhRzAKDeWZ9LE2etLspiAiFCG8OeeEGoHwCgoLhb crxreFQ2LNVjAp24beDMK5g= =C59m -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: