Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41E61A6C.4020203@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: > Don't forget your support contract cost, as well as licenses for each > of your servers: development, testing, QA, etc. > > Is it really as "cheap" as 5K? I've heard that for any fairly modern > system, it's much more, but that may be wrong. > Sort of -- see: http://oraclestore.oracle.com/OA_HTML/ibeCCtpSctDspRte.jsp?section=15105 "It is available on single server systems supporting up to a maximum of 2 CPUs" Also note that most industrial strength features (like table partitioning, RAC, OLAP, Enterprise Manager plugins, etc, etc) are high priced options (mostly $10K to $20K per CPU) and they can only be used with the Enterprise edition (which is $40K/CPU *not* $2.5K/CPU). http://oraclestore.oracle.com/OA_HTML/ibeCCtpSctDspRte.jsp?section=10103 And you are correct, they expect to be paid for each dev, test, and QA machine too. The $5K edition is just there to get you hooked ;-) By the time you add up what you really want/need, figure you'll spend a couple of orders of magnatude higher, and then > 20% per year for ongoing maintenance/upgrades/support. Joe
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: