Re: pg_recvlogical cannot create slots with failover=true
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_recvlogical cannot create slots with failover=true |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a28f66df-1354-4709-8d63-932ded4cac35@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_recvlogical cannot create slots with failover=true (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_recvlogical cannot create slots with failover=true
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07.04.25 21:15, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 7:19 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) > <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 1:45 AM Masahiko Sawada wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> Thank you for updating the patch! Pushed with small cosmetic changes. >> >> Thanks for pushing the feature ! >> >> I noticed one typo in the doc and here is a tiny patch to fix it. >> >> - The <option>--two-phase</option> and <option>--falover</option> options >> + The <option>--two-phase</option> and <option>--failover</option> options > > Thank you for the report and the patch! Pushed. I wonder if the option name --failover is ideal. To me, it sounds like an action "do a failover!". Also consider that pg_recvlogical has other action options such as --start and --create-slot, so it sounds a bit like those. Maybe something like --enable-failover would be better?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: