Re: pg_recvlogical cannot create slots with failover=true
От | Masahiko Sawada |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_recvlogical cannot create slots with failover=true |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAD21AoAqsStJBQ79YzNJoAXQhOKGTtkwijh4k+Eu9RoopoMfEQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_recvlogical cannot create slots with failover=true (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_recvlogical cannot create slots with failover=true
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 10:42 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: > > On 07.04.25 21:15, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 7:19 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) > > <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 1:45 AM Masahiko Sawada wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >>> Thank you for updating the patch! Pushed with small cosmetic changes. > >> > >> Thanks for pushing the feature ! > >> > >> I noticed one typo in the doc and here is a tiny patch to fix it. > >> > >> - The <option>--two-phase</option> and <option>--falover</option> options > >> + The <option>--two-phase</option> and <option>--failover</option> options > > > > Thank you for the report and the patch! Pushed. > > I wonder if the option name --failover is ideal. To me, it sounds like > an action "do a failover!". Also consider that pg_recvlogical has other > action options such as --start and --create-slot, so it sounds a bit > like those. Fair point. > Maybe something like --enable-failover would be better? Sounds better, but probably the --two-phase option has the same issue? Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: