Re: [patch] ENUM errdetail should mention bytes, not chars
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [patch] ENUM errdetail should mention bytes, not chars |
Дата | |
Msg-id | a0e3e2e5-7184-233b-462e-435e1490b85b@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [patch] ENUM errdetail should mention bytes, not chars (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [patch] ENUM errdetail should mention bytes, not chars
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-10-19 06:34, Julien Rouhaud wrote: >> ERROR: invalid enum label "ああああああああああああああああああああああ" >> DETAIL: Labels must be 63 characters or less. >> >> Attached trivial patch changes the message to: >> >> DETAIL: Labels must be 63 bytes or less. >> >> This matches the documentation, which states: >> >> The length of an enum value's textual label is limited by the NAMEDATALEN >> setting compiled into PostgreSQL; in standard builds this means at most >> 63 bytes. >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-enum.html >> >> I don't see any particular need to backpatch this. > > Indeed the message is wrong, and patch LGTM. Committed. Btw., the patch didn't update the regression test output. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: