Re: [patch] ENUM errdetail should mention bytes, not chars
От | Julien Rouhaud |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [patch] ENUM errdetail should mention bytes, not chars |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAOBaU_Z=nqiSGjtD_+bak61QLVwPuaibWg=WgcatdWWaDA4Jcg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [patch] ENUM errdetail should mention bytes, not chars (Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [patch] ENUM errdetail should mention bytes, not chars
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 12:18 PM Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > The errdetail emitted when creating/modifying an ENUM value is misleading: > > postgres=# CREATE TYPE enum_valtest AS ENUM ( > 'foo', > 'ああああああああああああああああああああああ' > ); > ERROR: invalid enum label "ああああああああああああああああああああああ" > DETAIL: Labels must be 63 characters or less. > > Attached trivial patch changes the message to: > > DETAIL: Labels must be 63 bytes or less. > > This matches the documentation, which states: > > The length of an enum value's textual label is limited by the NAMEDATALEN > setting compiled into PostgreSQL; in standard builds this means at most > 63 bytes. > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-enum.html > > I don't see any particular need to backpatch this. Indeed the message is wrong, and patch LGTM.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: