Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | ZXbaDg5fBl8GLy2u@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Adding facility for injection points (or probe points?) for more advanced tests
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 11:09:45AM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote: > I haven't specifically done a review or testing of this patch, but I > have used this for testing the CLOG group update code with my > SLRU-specific changes and I found it quite helpful to test some of the > concurrent areas where you need to stop processing somewhere in the > middle of the code and testing that area without this kind of > injection point framework is really difficult or may not be even > possible. We wanted to test the case of clog group update where we > can get multiple processes added to a single group and get the xid > status updated by the group leader, you can refer to my test in that > thread[1] (the last patch test_group_commit.patch is using this > framework for testing). Could you be more specific? test_group_commit.patch includes this line but there is nothing specific about this injection point getting used in a test or a callback assigned to it: ./test_group_commit.patch:+ INJECTION_POINT("ClogGroupCommit"); > Overall I feel this framework is quite useful > and easy to use as well. Cool, thanks. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: