Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node?
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | YBTFgGiLki8eKE7M@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 08:53:49PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes: >> I don't know anybody that still runs Postgres >> (or anything like it) on a 32-bit platform. I think that Michael >> Paquier owns a Raspberry Pi zero, but that hardly counts. hamster died a couple of years ago, it was a RPI1 and I have not bought one after. RIP to it. I still have dangomushi, a RPI2, based on armv7l and that's 32-bit. Heikki has chipmunk, which is a RPI1 last time we discussed about that. The good thing about those machines is that they are low-energy consumers, and silent. So it is easy to forget about them and just let them be. > Hmph ... three of my five buildfarm animals are 32-bit, plus I > have got 32-bit OSes for my Raspberry Pi ;-). Admittedly, none > of those represent hardware someone would put a serious database > on today. But in terms of testing diversity, I think they're > a lot more credible than thirty-one flavors of Linux on x86_64. Those 32-bit modules are still being sold actively by the RPI foundation, and used as cheap machines for education purposes, so I think that it is still useful for Postgres to have active buildfarm members for 32-bit architectures. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: