Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2847014.1611971629@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node?
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 4:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> We do still have x86 in the buildfarm, as well as some other >> 32-bit platforms, so I don't agree that it's that much less >> tested than non-mainstream 64-bit platforms. > I don't know anybody that still runs Postgres > (or anything like it) on a 32-bit platform. I think that Michael > Paquier owns a Raspberry Pi zero, but that hardly counts. Hmph ... three of my five buildfarm animals are 32-bit, plus I have got 32-bit OSes for my Raspberry Pi ;-). Admittedly, none of those represent hardware someone would put a serious database on today. But in terms of testing diversity, I think they're a lot more credible than thirty-one flavors of Linux on x86_64. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: