Re: Benchmark Data requested
От | Matthew |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Benchmark Data requested |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0802051554010.20402@aragorn.flymine.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Benchmark Data requested (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Benchmark Data requested
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Richard Huxton wrote: >> Why would you need to lock the table? > > Because you're not really writing the WAL, which means you can't let anyone > else get their data into any of the blocks you are writing into. You'd > basically want to write the disk blocks then "attach" them in some way. So what's wrong with "reserving" the space using the WAL, then everyone else will know. After all, when you write the data to the WAL, you must have an idea of where it is meant to end up. My suggestion is that you go through all the motions of writing the data to the WAL, just without the data bit. Matthew -- Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product. -- Ferenc Mantfeld
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: