Re: [PERFORM] [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of
От | Gavin Sherry |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PERFORM] [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.58.0405070828310.15418@linuxworld.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PERFORM] [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL (Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar@frodo.hserus.net>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Shridhar Daithankar wrote: > Richard Huxton wrote: > > > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > >>>> What's the case of bigger database PostgreSQL (so greate and amount of > >>>> registers) that they know??? > >> Didn't someone say that RedSheriff had a 10TB postgres database or > >> something? > > From http://www.redsheriff.com/us/news/news_4_201.html > > > > "According to the company, RedSheriff processes 10 billion records a > > month and the total amount of data managed is more than 32TB. Griffin > > said PostgreSQL has been in production for 12 months with not a single > > database fault in that time “The stability of the database can not be > > questioned. Needless to say, we are extremely happy." > > > > I think it's safe to assume this is not on a spare Dell 600SC though. > > > > I think we should have a case study for that. And publish it on our regular > news/press contacts(Can't imagine the flame war on /...Umm Yummy..:-)). It would > make a lot of noise and gain visibility for us. > > Of course Red Sherrif need to co-operate and spell the details and/or moderate > what we write, but all in all, 32TB database is uber-cool..:-) I've tried contacting them. They will not return my phone calls or emails. Gavin
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: