Re: [PERFORM] [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PERFORM] [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of the PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4099FAAD.4040202@frodo.hserus.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [PERFORM] [OFF-TOPIC] - Known maximum size of
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Richard Huxton wrote: > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > >>>> What's the case of bigger database PostgreSQL (so greate and amount of >>>> registers) that they know??? >> Didn't someone say that RedSheriff had a 10TB postgres database or >> something? > From http://www.redsheriff.com/us/news/news_4_201.html > > "According to the company, RedSheriff processes 10 billion records a > month and the total amount of data managed is more than 32TB. Griffin > said PostgreSQL has been in production for 12 months with not a single > database fault in that time “The stability of the database can not be > questioned. Needless to say, we are extremely happy." > > I think it's safe to assume this is not on a spare Dell 600SC though. > I think we should have a case study for that. And publish it on our regular news/press contacts(Can't imagine the flame war on /...Umm Yummy..:-)). It would make a lot of noise and gain visibility for us. Of course Red Sherrif need to co-operate and spell the details and/or moderate what we write, but all in all, 32TB database is uber-cool..:-) Shridhar
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: