Re: BLOBs vs BYTEA
От | Achilleus Mantzios |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BLOBs vs BYTEA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0502011002430.32497-100000@matrix.gatewaynet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BLOBs vs BYTEA (Dennis Sacks <dennis@illusions.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BLOBs vs BYTEA
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
O Dennis Sacks έγραψε στις Jan 31, 2005 : > Sam Adams wrote: > > >Anyway, I was wondering which would be a better way to store a large > >amount of files each a few megabytes in size. There could be hundreds of > >thousands of files altogether. If stored as BYTEAs this would put them > >all in a single table. Would this effect performance considerablely? I > >assume if there were thousands then it would. But if the data is stored > >as BLOBs then aren't they store inside the database just in another > >table? Wouldn't this also be undesirable. Would it be better to store > >them normally on the file system and just provide the path and file name > >in the database. Obviously this wont provide any security or backup but > >would it make sense to do it this way with such a large amount of data? > > > > > This is one of those age old debates. I've done both, and I'll tell you > that in my experience it is less of a headache to store the files in the > filesystem (which is what filesystems are designed for) and store the > metadata in the database. I think if you are doing replication or write in java, you'll be much happier with bytea. > > Dennis Sacks > dennis@illusions.com > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- -Achilleus
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: