Re: BLOBs vs BYTEA
От | Dennis Sacks |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BLOBs vs BYTEA |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 41FEFCAA.5070603@illusions.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BLOBs vs BYTEA ("Sam Adams" <samadams@myfastmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BLOBs vs BYTEA
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
Sam Adams wrote: >Anyway, I was wondering which would be a better way to store a large >amount of files each a few megabytes in size. There could be hundreds of >thousands of files altogether. If stored as BYTEAs this would put them >all in a single table. Would this effect performance considerablely? I >assume if there were thousands then it would. But if the data is stored >as BLOBs then aren't they store inside the database just in another >table? Wouldn't this also be undesirable. Would it be better to store >them normally on the file system and just provide the path and file name >in the database. Obviously this wont provide any security or backup but >would it make sense to do it this way with such a large amount of data? > > This is one of those age old debates. I've done both, and I'll tell you that in my experience it is less of a headache to store the files in the filesystem (which is what filesystems are designed for) and store the metadata in the database. Dennis Sacks dennis@illusions.com
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: