Re: PostgreSQL not ACID compliant?
От | Philip Yarra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL not ACID compliant? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0309201053110.27892-100000@ser1.cpc.net.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL not ACID compliant? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL not ACID compliant?
Re: PostgreSQL not ACID compliant? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
It's funny timing - I had to prepare a comparison between PostgreSQL and MySQL recently, explaining why we would prefer PostgreSQL. I know some people here have issues with the MySQL crashme test results, but I have to say I found it possibly one of the best postgreSQL advertisements available. A 4-way comparison between Sybase, Oracle, MySQL and PostgreSQL shows PostgreSQL in an extremely flattering light. Given the missing features in MySQL (column constraints and views, for god's sake!) I had to conclude that we couldn't implement most of our projects in MySQL, even if we wanted to. I have trouble believing MySQL was suggested as a viable alternative. I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but thought you might find it of interest. Regards, Philip Yarra.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: