Re: PostgreSQL not ACID compliant?
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL not ACID compliant? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F6BA92D.6070800@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL not ACID compliant? (Philip Yarra <philip@utiba.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, Actually if you really want to scare them. 1. Use Innodb 2. Create 5000 inserts with at least 5k of data. The table needs to have a primary key. 3. Insert the 5000 records for 50 connections (250,000 inserts). 4. Watch the deadlocks fly. They didn't believe me. Then the guy tried it live on #mysql... and it crashed. He blamed it on the fact he only gave 8 meg to Innodb. Sincerely, Joshua Drake Philip Yarra wrote: >It's funny timing - I had to prepare a comparison between PostgreSQL and >MySQL recently, explaining why we would prefer PostgreSQL. I know some >people here have issues with the MySQL crashme test results, but I have to >say I found it possibly one of the best postgreSQL advertisements >available. A 4-way comparison between Sybase, Oracle, MySQL and PostgreSQL >shows PostgreSQL in an extremely flattering light. > >Given the missing features in MySQL (column constraints and views, for >god's sake!) I had to >conclude that we couldn't implement most of our projects in MySQL, even if >we wanted to. I have trouble believing MySQL was suggested as a viable >alternative. > >I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but thought you might find it of >interest. > >Regards, Philip Yarra. > > -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-222-2783 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com The most reliable support for the most reliable Open Source database.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: