Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Documentation quality WAS: interesting
От | scott.marlowe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Documentation quality WAS: interesting |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.33.0306240938310.26977-100000@css120.ihs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Documentation quality WAS: interesting (nolan@celery.tssi.com) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 nolan@celery.tssi.com wrote: > > There also ssh clients which support X11 forwarding on a windows machine > > and since there are X11 servers for windows... > > You don't necessarily need a unix workstation. Apart from that, a > > (tight)vnc server might be less bandwidth consuming. > > I've always figured X11 was proof that you can never have a fast enough > CPU or enough memory. :-) > > I've tried X11 across a DSL line, it gives a whole new meaning to the > word slow. I wound up creating a SSH tunnel to a browser inside the > client's firewall, a solution neither of us are entirely happy with, > as it may have some security concerns. We're probably setting up a VPN > connection, but that's hung up in accounting. > > My point is that solutions which require other technology just to install > or use, whether that be a simple browser or X11, can be self-defeating. > > If we're trying to sell ourselves to the PHP and/or MySQL communities, > needing or even recommending X11 isn't the direction we should be going. No argument there. It would be nice to have a standard text formatted set of docs for users who need a lowest common denominator type setup.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: