Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting
От | nolan@celery.tssi.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20030624153134.5907.qmail@celery.tssi.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting ("Arjen van der Meijden" <acm@tweakers.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Documentation quality WAS: interesting
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> There also ssh clients which support X11 forwarding on a windows machine > and since there are X11 servers for windows... > You don't necessarily need a unix workstation. Apart from that, a > (tight)vnc server might be less bandwidth consuming. I've always figured X11 was proof that you can never have a fast enough CPU or enough memory. :-) I've tried X11 across a DSL line, it gives a whole new meaning to the word slow. I wound up creating a SSH tunnel to a browser inside the client's firewall, a solution neither of us are entirely happy with, as it may have some security concerns. We're probably setting up a VPN connection, but that's hung up in accounting. My point is that solutions which require other technology just to install or use, whether that be a simple browser or X11, can be self-defeating. If we're trying to sell ourselves to the PHP and/or MySQL communities, needing or even recommending X11 isn't the direction we should be going. -- Mike Nolan
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: