Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.21.0002062350010.13872-100000@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2000-02-06, Thomas Lockhart mentioned: > > The suggestion I have is to offer the traditional behaviour with a single > > -e flag, so there's little change for anyone switching from <7.0, and the > > "full" echo mode with two -e flags. I'd then change the flags in the > > regression drivers to -e -e. Comments? Better ideas? > > Hmm. imho having a *count* of switch options being significant is the > wrong way to go. It gets in the way of things like > > # alias ps psql -e > # ps -e postgres > > where someone has defined a "convenience" alias for everyone and > someone else uses it later. Also, it is a style of switch invocation > not appearing elsewhere afaik. I don't like it either, but I wasn't sure of a better way. > > I'd suggest a switch style like "-ee" or "-eb" (backend) or "-ev" > (verbatim) or ??? Comments? Well that is an option style that doesn't appear anywhere either other than perhaps find(1). getopt() would read "-ee" exactly as "-e -e", a behaviour which conforms to POSIX and GNU and ROW (rest of world). -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: