Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 389DA2A0.EC14B8D3@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | psql -e and -n flags (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags
Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> The suggestion I have is to offer the traditional behaviour with a single > -e flag, so there's little change for anyone switching from <7.0, and the > "full" echo mode with two -e flags. I'd then change the flags in the > regression drivers to -e -e. Comments? Better ideas? Hmm. imho having a *count* of switch options being significant is the wrong way to go. It gets in the way of things like # alias ps psql -e # ps -e postgres where someone has defined a "convenience" alias for everyone and someone else uses it later. Also, it is a style of switch invocation not appearing elsewhere afaik. I'd suggest a switch style like "-ee" or "-eb" (backend) or "-ev" (verbatim) or ??? Comments? - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: