Re: GreatBridge RPMs (was: Re: question)
От | Roderick A. Anderson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GreatBridge RPMs (was: Re: question) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.10.10101231251200.10395-100000@tincan.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GreatBridge RPMs (was: Re: question) (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > In general, RPMs only work on systems that are the same as the one they > were built on, for various degrees of "same". If you're not picking up > the RPMs from your distributor or you're sure that the builder used the > same version as you have, it's always prudent to rebuild from the source > RPM. That should work, unless the package spec makes some unportable > assumptions, such as different file system layouts. But that is often > only an annoyance, not a real problem. While trying to get the FrontPage Extensions installed on a RedHat/Apache system I ran into to different version numbering systems between RedHat and Mandrake. Major pain. One called for perl 5.6.0-xxx and the other perl 5.60-xxx. After several hours of screwing around with it I took a break. Fortunately before I spent any more time on it the client I was going to do it for decided to not run them with Apache. I'm glad to see GreatBridge will be providing RPM's for many distributions. Though I do tend to re-compile from source I've found that those mdk's don't work too good with RHL. Rod --
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: