Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC
От | Jose' Soares Da Silva |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.96.980430155515.680A-100000@proxy.bazzanese.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote: > > > > I vote for changing default date format to ISO-8601 to reflect > > > Hear! Hear! Good standards beat silly conventions any day! > > Seems that you don't like conventions Tom, but you want > > that all world use dates with American format. > > Seems that you want impose one convention. > > We're working with a database which name is PostgreSQL. > > I suppose that you know what's mean the last 3 letters. > > Uh, Jose', he was agreeing with you :)) I'm sorry Tom Ivar, my mistake (guilt of my poor english) > > Anyway, imo the only issue is _when_ this kind of change should take > place. My comment in the documentation did not promise that it would > change in the next release, Yes I know... > only that it might change in a future > release. btw, I don't think that the ISO date style is mandated by the > SQL92 standard, but it does seem like a good idea, particularly as we > approach y2k... I think so, Tom. Here the syntax from... (Second Informal Review Draft) ISO/IEC 9075:1992, Database Language SQL- July 30, 1992 5.3 <literal> <date literal> ::= DATE <date string> <date string> ::= <quote> <date value> <quote> <date value> ::= <years value> <minus sign> <months value> <minus sign> <days value> example date syntax: DATE '0001-01-01' DATE '9999-12-31' Ok, I know that keyword DATE before value is a silly and an useless thing but YYYY-MM-DD format it's an intelligent thing. > Of course, since we now have the PGDATESTYLE environment variable, > usable by both the backend (at startup) and libpq (at connect time), > perhaps a change in default date format is not something to worry about > too much. > > I haven't heard any negative comments (yet) about changing the default > date format to ISO-8601 (yyyy-mm-dd). Does anyone have a strong feeling > that this should _not_ happen for v6.4?? > > Speak up or it might happen ;) Go for it Tom! Jose'
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: