Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC
От | Thomas G. Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 354877C1.3203C5F3@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [INTERFACES] Access'97 and ODBC
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > I vote for changing default date format to ISO-8601 to reflect > > Hear! Hear! Good standards beat silly conventions any day! > Seems that you don't like conventions Tom, but you want > that all world use dates with American format. > Seems that you want impose one convention. > We're working with a database which name is PostgreSQL. > I suppose that you know what's mean the last 3 letters. Uh, Jose', he was agreeing with you :)) Anyway, imo the only issue is _when_ this kind of change should take place. My comment in the documentation did not promise that it would change in the next release, only that it might change in a future release. btw, I don't think that the ISO date style is mandated by the SQL92 standard, but it does seem like a good idea, particularly as we approach y2k... Of course, since we now have the PGDATESTYLE environment variable, usable by both the backend (at startup) and libpq (at connect time), perhaps a change in default date format is not something to worry about too much. I haven't heard any negative comments (yet) about changing the default date format to ISO-8601 (yyyy-mm-dd). Does anyone have a strong feeling that this should _not_ happen for v6.4?? Speak up or it might happen ;) - Tom
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: