Re: Proposal for async support in libpq
От | Jan Vicherek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal for async support in libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.96.980421005858.3665U-100000@ann.ied.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for async support in libpq (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Proposal for async support in libpq
Re: Proposal for async support in libpq |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > You supply the indication to the backend, and I will see that the > > backend processes it properly. > > You're on ;-) > > Signaling the cancel request via OOB sounds reasonable, as long as > nothing else is using it and all the systems we care about support it. SSH doesn't have OOB. You can't send an OOB via SSH encrypted channel. Jan -- Gospel of Jesus is the saving power of God for all who believe -- Jan Vicherek ## To some, nothing is impossible. ## www.ied.com/~honza >>> Free Software Union President ... www.fslu.org <<< Interactive Electronic Design Inc. -#- PGP: finger honza@ied.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: