Re: Proposal for async support in libpq
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal for async support in libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199804211634.MAA14247@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal for async support in libpq (Jan Vicherek <honza@ied.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal for async support in libpq
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > You supply the indication to the backend, and I will see that the > > > backend processes it properly. > > > > You're on ;-) > > > > Signaling the cancel request via OOB sounds reasonable, as long as > > nothing else is using it and all the systems we care about support it. > > SSH doesn't have OOB. You can't send an OOB via SSH encrypted channel. I have trouble buying that. SSH is just the socket filter. Perhaps the OOB data is not encrypted like the normal data? -- Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 + If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w) + Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: