Re: Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation
От | Karel Zak |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.96.1000720110001.11997C-100000@ara.zf.jcu.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation (Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@pasteur.fr>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Thursday 20 July 2000, at 10 h 0, the keyboard of Karel Zak > <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz> wrote: > > > And what is a "large database"? 1, 5 .. 10Gb? If yes, (IMHO) the PostgreSQL > > is good choice. > > Even on Linux? I'm studying a database project where the raw data is 10 to 20 > Gb (it will be in several tables in the same database). Linux has a limit of 2 > Gb for a file (even on 64-bits machine, if I'm correct). A colleague told me > to use NetBSD instead, because PostgreSQL on a Linux machine cannot host more > than 2 Gb per database. Any practical experience? (I'm not interested in "It > should work".) I must again say: "The PostgreSQL is good choice" :-) The postgres chunks DB files, not exist 2Gb limit here... Karel
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: