Re: Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation
От | Stephane Bortzmeyer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200007200835.KAA19063@ezili.sis.pasteur.fr обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation (Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation
Re: Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation Re: Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation Re: Re: [HACKERS] 8Ko limitation |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thursday 20 July 2000, at 10 h 0, the keyboard of Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz> wrote: > And what is a "large database"? 1, 5 .. 10Gb? If yes, (IMHO) the PostgreSQL > is good choice. Even on Linux? I'm studying a database project where the raw data is 10 to 20 Gb (it will be in several tables in the same database). Linux has a limit of 2 Gb for a file (even on 64-bits machine, if I'm correct). A colleague told me to use NetBSD instead, because PostgreSQL on a Linux machine cannot host more than 2 Gb per database. Any practical experience? (I'm not interested in "It should work".)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: