Re: [HACKERS] Connect string again
От | Peter T Mount |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Connect string again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.3.95.980526185131.1473A-100000@retep.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Connect string again (Michael Meskes <meskes@topsystem.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Connect string again
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 25 May 1998, Michael Meskes wrote: > A while ago we agreed to use DB names like the JDBC standard: > > <protocol>:postgresql:\\<server>[:port]\dbname[?<option>] > > Before I start working on libpq I would like to know which protocols it > should accept. Is there a norm for this? > > Suggestions: sql, esql, pq, ecpg ... pq seems to be a little too short to me. I'd have thought sql, or libpq. ecpg could be used as well for clients that use ecpg. While thinking about this, an alternative could be the network protocol being used, tcp or unix (although the server part of the url would be ignored for this one). -- Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk or petermount@earthling.net Main Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk ************ Someday I may rebuild this signature completely ;-) ************ Work Homepage: http://www.maidstone.gov.uk Work EMail: peter@maidstone.gov.uk
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: