Re: large tables and simple "= constant" queries using indexes
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: large tables and simple "= constant" queries using indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.64.0804101437030.15531@westnet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: large tables and simple "= constant" queries using indexes (Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Bill Moran wrote: > If you install the pg_buffercache addon, you can actually look into > PostgreSQL's internals and see what tables are in the buffer in real > time. The "Inside the PostgreSQL Buffer Cache" talk I did at the recent East conference is now on-line at http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/postgresql/ The slides explain how that information gets updated and used internally, and the separate "sample queries" file there shows some more complicated views I've written against pg_buffercache. Here's a sample one: relname |buffered| buffers % | % of rel accounts | 306 MB | 65.3 | 24.7 accounts_pkey | 160 MB | 34.1 | 93.2 This shows that 65.3% of the buffer cache is filled with the accounts table, which is caching 24.7% of the full table. These are labeled "relations" because there's a mix of table and index data there. accounts_pkey is an index for example, which is why almost all of it is staying inside the buffer cache. The queries that use usage_count only work against 8.3, that one above should work on older versions as well. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: