Re: large tables and simple "= constant" queries using indexes
От | Bill Moran |
---|---|
Тема | Re: large tables and simple "= constant" queries using indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20080410130854.f3a3f110.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: large tables and simple "= constant" queries using indexes (John Beaver <john.e.beaver@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: large tables and simple "= constant" queries using
indexes
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
In response to John Beaver <john.e.beaver@gmail.com>: > Thanks Eric and Gaestano - interesting, and both examples of my naivite. :) > > I tried running large select(*) queries on other tables followed by another try at the offending query, and it was stillfast. Just to be absolutely sure this is a scalable solution, I'll try restarting my computer in a few hours to seeif it affects anything cache-wise. I say this over and over again ... because I think it's really cool and useful. If you install the pg_buffercache addon, you can actually look into PostgreSQL's internals and see what tables are in the buffer in real time. If you're having trouble, it can (potentially) be a helpful tool. -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc. http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ wmoran@collaborativefusion.com Phone: 412-422-3463x4023
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: