Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
От | Alexander Staubo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 88daf38c0708241449q2e4fb3dfx17a6cab7c5d7f650@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 8/24/07, Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> wrote: > Alban Hertroys wrote: > > So actually the remark shouldn't be that "the multi-threaded > > architecture is only advantageous on Windows", but more like "the > > multi-process architecture is disadvantageous on Windows and hence a > > multi-threaded architecture is preferred (on that particular OS)". > > Yeah - but I'm not sure thats necessarily something that should have a > place on a bullet point comparison. You solve it by letting the category be labeled "Process/thread architecture", and letting the columns say "Thread-based" for Firebird and "Process-based" for PostgreSQL respectively. Then add a footnote about this row that explains the difference and how they behave on the different operating systems. PostgreSQL clearly is at a slight disadvantage on Windows, so this is relevant, at least to Tony's Delphi-user demographic. Alexander.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: