Re: [HACKERS] TODO list
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] TODO list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.GSO.4.02A.10001171210490.8593-100000@Puma.DoCS.UU.SE обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] TODO list (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > * Make Absolutetime/Relativetime int4 because time_t can be int8 on some > > ports > > Does this mean the abstime/reltime types or all of them? I thought the > > former were deprecated anyway. > > abstime should probably be considered deprecated as a user type, but > it is still used extensively internally and within the tuple > structure. I'd be reluctant to wholesale replace it with > timestamp/datetime, since that will take 8 bytes per value rather than > 4. Just so I understand this: The official SQL data types are "timestamp" and "interval", right? Everything else will eventually be an alias or phased out or whatever? I've been itching to change the pg_shadow.valuntil column to timestamp anyway, I suppose that would be a step in the right direction, or not? -- Peter Eisentraut Sernanders vaeg 10:115 peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: