Re: [HACKERS] TODO list
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] TODO list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3882CC7A.25F9C11F@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | TODO list (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] TODO list
Re: [HACKERS] TODO list |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> * Allow array on int8[] > Done. (Credit to Thomas, thought, he just forgot to apply the patch.) Thanks. btw, didn't forget, but wanted confirmation that it worked (which I got a day or two later). > * Make Absolutetime/Relativetime int4 because time_t can be int8 on some > ports > Does this mean the abstime/reltime types or all of them? I thought the > former were deprecated anyway. abstime should probably be considered deprecated as a user type, but it is still used extensively internally and within the tuple structure. I'd be reluctant to wholesale replace it with timestamp/datetime, since that will take 8 bytes per value rather than 4. - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: