(Really) Re: [PATCH] inet << indexability
От | Alex Pilosov |
---|---|
Тема | (Really) Re: [PATCH] inet << indexability |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.10.10106152331010.17529-200000@spider.pilosoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [PATCH] inet << indexability (Alex Pilosov <alex@pilosoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: (Really) Re: [PATCH] inet << indexability
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Augh. Previous patch had some garbage changes in it. Sorry. This one is clean...I promise, I'll get better at this. -alex On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Alex Pilosov wrote: > This is second take at indexability of << operator for inet types. > > Please take a look at it. > > Also, I have a question: I put in a regression test to check that the type > can be indexed, by doing 'explain select ...'. However, the expected > result may vary when the optimizer is tweaked. > > I am not sure if its a good idea to check for that, so feel free to not > commit the regression test part of this patch...If there's a better way to > check that the query will use the index in regression test, I'd like to > know too. > > -alex >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: