Re: (Really) Re: [PATCH] inet << indexability

Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

> Augh. Previous patch had some garbage changes in it. Sorry. This one is
> clean...I promise, I'll get better at this.
> 
> -alex
> 
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Alex Pilosov wrote:
> 
> > This is second take at indexability of << operator for inet types.
> > 
> > Please take a look at it. 
> > 
> > Also, I have a question: I put in a regression test to check that the type
> > can be indexed, by doing 'explain select ...'. However, the expected
> > result may vary when the optimizer is tweaked. 
> > 
> > I am not sure if its a good idea to check for that, so feel free to not
> > commit the regression test part of this patch...If there's a better way to
> > check that the query will use the index in regression test, I'd like to
> > know too.
> > 
> > -alex
> > 

Content-Description: 

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026