Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol

On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:

> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > > > I can put it back.  You want it back?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes.
> > > > ISTM discussion is needed before the change.
> > >
> > > I'm with Bruce on this (sorry Hiroshi :-)):
> > >
> > > 1) Surely if anyone is still using 6.3 or 6.2 they will probably not be
> > > wanting to keep their ODBC driver cutting edge whilst using such an old
> > > backend.
> >
> > I think Hiroshi's complaint was that it should be discussed more.
> > Seems we have discussed it, and most agree on the removal.
> >
>
> Hmm I think you are not walking a proper 'discussion first'
> process in the first place. You committed the removal 7 hours
> after you had posted the first mail of this thread.
> Is it sufficient ?

Nope, a *discussion* should go for *at least* 24 hrs after the first post
in the discussion ... then again, similar rules should apply before
applying any patches in the first place ... *roll eyes*