Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol

> > > I think Hiroshi's complaint was that it should be discussed more.
> > > Seems we have discussed it, and most agree on the removal.
> > >
> >
> > Hmm I think you are not walking a proper 'discussion first'
> > process in the first place. You committed the removal 7 hours
> > after you had posted the first mail of this thread.
> > Is it sufficient ?
>
> Nope, a *discussion* should go for *at least* 24 hrs after the first post
> in the discussion ... then again, similar rules should apply before
> applying any patches in the first place ... *roll eyes*

Removal seemed to obvious to discuss, I guess, and when I got on OK, I
was on my way.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026