Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ...
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0009080005590.527-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > > On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > >> I have committed a fix into REL7_0 branch. Although it seems to work, > >> I don't trust it really far because it depends on heap_markpos() and > >> heap_restrpos(), which haven't been used in a long time and are full > >> of alarmed-sounding comments. > > > Do you have any thoughts as to what sorts of problems *might* > > arise? Like, are we talking database corruption possibilities, or bad > > results, or ... ? Just want to have an idea of what to try and keep an > > eye out for ... > > I may be overstating the cause for worry. All of the "alarmed-sounding > comments" appear to date back to the original Postgres95 sources, and > are probably obsolete. The only thing I really have any concern about > is whether buffer pin/unpin bookkeeping is correct. If it's not, > you'd see an Assert failure from too many unpins (you are running with > --enable-cassert I hope) or "Buffer Leak" notices in the log from too > many pins. Haven't been running it with cassert, but will enable it *nod* Thanks for the backpatch ...:)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: