Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ...
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 22887.968382164@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ... (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote: >> I have committed a fix into REL7_0 branch. Although it seems to work, >> I don't trust it really far because it depends on heap_markpos() and >> heap_restrpos(), which haven't been used in a long time and are full >> of alarmed-sounding comments. > Do you have any thoughts as to what sorts of problems *might* > arise? Like, are we talking database corruption possibilities, or bad > results, or ... ? Just want to have an idea of what to try and keep an > eye out for ... I may be overstating the cause for worry. All of the "alarmed-sounding comments" appear to date back to the original Postgres95 sources, and are probably obsolete. The only thing I really have any concern about is whether buffer pin/unpin bookkeeping is correct. If it's not, you'd see an Assert failure from too many unpins (you are running with --enable-cassert I hope) or "Buffer Leak" notices in the log from too many pins. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: