Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's)
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0008201116140.3758-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's) (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane writes: > > > (a) a bug *tracking* system is not the same as a bug *reporting* > > system. A tracking system will be useless if it gets cluttered > > with non-bug reports, duplicate entries, etc. There must be a human > > filter controlling what gets entered into the system. > > Letting any user submit bug reports directly into any such system is > certainly not going to work, we'd have "query does not use index" 5 times > a day. I consider the current *reporting* procedure pretty good; web forms > are overrated in my mind. > > What I had in mind was more a databased incarnation of the TODO list. I > mean, who are we kidding, we are writing a database and maintain the list > of problems in flat text. The TODO list has already moved to the > TODO.detail extension, but we could take it a bit further. > > I think currently too many issues get lost, or discussed over and over > again. Many developers maintain their own little lists. The TODO list > often cannot be deciphered by end users and hence does not get read. A TODO list that one can add comments to ...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: