Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.21.0002241903370.81087-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Using -f would work if you hadn't already overloaded it with another > > meaning; but as you say I don't much want to add line numbers to all > > the regress test expected outputs. (That would mean that > > adding/deleting lines in a test would create many bogus differences > > further down in its output, which would be a pain in the neck for the > > initial hand-validation of the changed output.) > > > > So I vote for a switch that suppresses reading psqlrc ... > > > > Yes, but are there cases where we would want psqlrc values set? Should > we specifically set all the variables ourselves on startup, just > over-riding what is in psqlrc? IMHO, the regression tests are based on a snapshot where psql is in a 'default state' ... why would we want psqlrc values set? Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: