Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200002241544.KAA18408@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] First experiences with Postgresql 7.0 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Using -f would work if you hadn't already overloaded it with another > meaning; but as you say I don't much want to add line numbers to all > the regress test expected outputs. (That would mean that > adding/deleting lines in a test would create many bogus differences > further down in its output, which would be a pain in the neck for the > initial hand-validation of the changed output.) > > So I vote for a switch that suppresses reading psqlrc ... > Yes, but are there cases where we would want psqlrc values set? Should we specifically set all the variables ourselves on startup, just over-riding what is in psqlrc? -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: