Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?
От | Vince Vielhaber |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.05.9910201050230.3530-100000@paprika.michvhf.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk> writes: > > Just a thought: How does this affect anything placed in the contrib > > directory? If someone writes a tool under the GPL, can it be included > > under the src/contrib directory, or would we fall foul just because it's > > included with our source? > > Good question. The GPL contains a clause to the effect that "mere > aggregation" of a GPL'd piece of code in a source distribution with > unrelated pieces of code is OK, even if those other pieces of code > are not GPL'd. But the contrib directory is not exactly unrelated > to the main Postgres distribution, so I'm not sure that we can point > to this clause to justify putting a GPL'd program in contrib. It'd > be a gray area... Items in the contrib section aren't required for the use of PostgreSQL, however PostgreSQL *is* required to use those items. So shouldn't the items in contrib have to change to a Berkeley style license? :) I mean it's only fair! Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com flame-mail: /dev/null # include <std/disclaimers.h> Have you seenhttp://www.pop4.net? Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com ==========================================================================
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: